• Louis Vuitton Outlet
  • Tiffany Co Outlet
  • Hollister Co Outlet
  • Oakley Outlet
  • Ray Ban Outlet
  • Gucci Outlet
  • Prada Outlet
  • Michael Kors Outlet
  • North Face Outlet
  • Abercrombie & Fitch Outlet
  • Chanel Outlet
  • Canada Goose Outlet
  • Lululemon Outlet
  • PJS Jacket Outlet
  • Moncler Outlet
  • Burberry Outlet
  • Longchamp Outlet
  • Hermes Outlet
  • UGG Outlets
  • Nike Outlet
  • Jordan Outlet
  • Toms Outlet
  • New Balance Outlet
  • MBT Outlet
  • Christian Louboutin Outlet
  • All Brands Belt
  • All Jersey
  • Authentic Louis Vuitton For Cheap
  • Authentic Discounted Louis Vuitton
  • Louis Vuitton 25 Speedy
  • Louis Vuitton Australia Online Sale
  • Louis Vuitton Speedy 35 With Shoulder Strap
  • Louis Vuitton Bag Styles
  • How Can You Tell A Real Louis Vuitton Belt
  • Louis Vuitton Blue Tote
  • The Scriptorium

    8/3/2005

    Bush backs intelligent design

    Filed under: — Jennifer Rast @ 1:43 pm

    The I.D. vs. evolution debate has been heating up for several years now, I believe, because of the many scientific problems with evolution that can no longer be covered up. There are increasing numbers of intelligent design supporters among science professionals and scholars, and it’s easy to find scientific journals and books exposing these problems. It can only help that we now have a President who supports teaching I.D. alongside evolution in schools.

    As you would expect, evolutionists have shifted their criticism of I.D. into overdrive. They’re also working harder than ever to establish the connection between I.D. and Christianity so as to keep it out of public schools. Now that intelligent design has a following among scientists, however, they’re going to have a harder time making that connection- many of those scientists are also agnostics. The intelligent design theory doesn’t promote belief in the God of the Bible, it simply recognizes that there is a great deal of scientific support for an intelligent designer of the universe. Intelligent design also clears up many of the scientific problems in the theory of evolution.

    The response from most evolution supporters is frustrating, to say the least. John Carlson was interviewing an I.D. opponent on his radio show yesterday. He asked the caller if she would be against both evolution and I.D. being taught in public schools. The caller responded that she didn’t feel something that isn’t supported by facts and science should be taught in the classroom, and then added that I.D. is a religious teaching which should be kept out of our schools. That’s the typical response you’ll get from any evolutionist and it likely won’t change, no matter what evidence you show them. So, Carlson asked if she would accept teaching only evolution but allowing the scientific problems in the theory of evolution to be taught as well. Her response to a proposed accurate, honest, and factual teaching of evolution? She doesn’t think the problems with evolutionary theory should be taught unless it’s in a setting like a graduate program. Presenting all the facts and including where science doesn’t support evolution, is too complicated for public school students in her opinion. In other words, she prefers indoctrination over investigating the facts and learning the truth in our public schools. She prefers to dumb them down, lie about the “facts” we have to support evolution, and be sure every student believes evolution is a proven (although not using the scientific method at all) fact with no unexplained scientific problems that would render evolution an unproved theory with many flaws and missing links.

    Evolutionists are scared. They know evolution has problems, and they don’t want anyone, especially schools, exposing them and ruing decades of indoctrination and lies. These same scientists will ridicule Christians for “blind faith”, but it is they who blindly accept evolution while ignoring the facts that prove science disagrees with evolution. This is why evolutionists boycott debates with I.D. scientists. This is why educators, activists, and scientists fight so hard against any changes in text books. They don’t want the truth to get out, because it doesn’t look good for them. They’ve been pushing evolutionary THEORY as fact for decades, and they don’t want anyone to take the blinders off and examine the science behind it.

    I’m hopeful that with enough support from parents, our government, and the students themselves, the indoctrination into evolutionary thinking that goes on in our schools will stop. If Evolutionists aren’t afraid of the facts, and are so sure they’re right, then let both views be taught. Show up at a debate with intelligent design scientists instead of boycotting them. If you’re right, you have nothing to worry about. If you continue to fight it, your lack of confidence in the theory you call fact will be exposed.

    President Bush jumped feet-first into the current debate raging in many states over how evolution should be taught in the nation’s schools, when he said both the evolution and intelligent design theories should be presented to students.

    Speaking with reporters Monday, Bush backed local control of how the origin of life is taught, but parted with the scientific establishment on its evolution monopoly.

    “I think that part of education is to expose people to different schools of thought,” Bush said. “You’re asking me whether or not people ought to be exposed to different ideas, the answer is yes.”

    The president declined to give his personal views on intelligent design, which proposes that some features of the natural world are best explained by an intelligent cause rather than an undirected process such as natural selection.

    Read the full article
    WND

    Independent Investigation: Democrats intimidate voters far more than GOP

    Filed under: — Jennifer Rast @ 10:17 am

    Following the 2004 election, Democrats continued their whining that began with the 2000 election. They claimed voters were intimidated, the black vote was suppressed, and the Ohio win for Bush was stolen because lines were too long at the polls(they forget the elections board is made up of Democrats there), and more Republican intimidation and vote suppression affected the election. They demanded re-counts, re-votes, and an independent investigation to expose the evil practices of the GOP. In many cases they got their re-counts. In Washington state multiple re-counts and mysteriously appearing new ballots “won” the Governorship for a Democrat that most agree should have lost.

    Now one of their other demands has been met. An independent investigation was done by the American Center for Voting Rights. That independent investigation found that Democrats are far more guilty of intimidation tactics and suppression campaigns against voters than Republicans. OOPS!! Democrats should have been more careful what they asked for. They should have read the local newspapers in Milwaukee (or the blogs) where voter suppression and intimidation by Democrats was big news (the MSM of course avoided it). Instead of sitting in grandma’s basement and ranting and raving on Democratic Underground messageboards about how disenfranchised they all were, they should have paid attention to the misleading phone calls and mailings being generated by their own party.

    You would think something as big as widespread vote fraud and voter intimidation would be big news. Perhaps some arrests might be made in the cases where the perpetrators are known. Sadly, there won’t be any punishment for the operatives who committed these crimes, and the media won’t report this the way they would have if the GOP were found guilty. The Democratic party will hide from it, this investigation will fade into history, and the election fraud will continue. Democrats got what they wanted. The American public has lost confidence in our system of voting, and Democrats will be able to call every election they lose a stolen election. Everyone will remember the widespread problems, but most people will continue to believe the GOP is responsible because that’s what the media will tell them.

    While Democrats routinely accuse Republicans of voter intimidation and suppression, neither party has a clean record on the issue. Instead, the evidence shows that Democrats waged aggressive intimidation and suppression campaigns against Republican voters and volunteers in 2004. Republicans have not been exempt from similar criticism in this area, as alleged voter intimidation and suppression activity by GOP operatives led the Republican National Committee to sign a consent decree repudiating such tactics in 1982. However, a careful review of the facts shows that in 2004, paid Democrat operatives were far more involved in voter intimidation and suppression efforts than their Republican counterparts. Examples include:

    * Paid Democrat operatives charged with slashing tires of 25 Republican get-out-the-vote vans in Milwaukee on the morning of Election Day.

    * Misleading telephone calls made by Democrat operatives targeting Republican voters in Ohio with the wrong date for the election and faulty polling place information.

    * Intimidating and deceiving mailings and telephone calls paid for by the DNC threatening Republican volunteers in Florida with legal action.

    * Union-coordinated intimidation and violence campaign targeting Republican campaign offices and volunteers resulting in a broken arm for a GOP volunteer in Florida.

    Read the full Report

    For more information on the investigation visit Captain’s Quarters