Obama picks Leon Panetta to head CIA
This scares me about as much as anything Obama has done thus far. He’s picked a person to head the Central Intelligence Agency that has no experience whatsoever in intelligence. Our safety is the one area where we don’t need another inexperienced Clinton holdover. What this pick tells me is that Obama is more interested in Panetta’s political prowess than his ability to prevent another attack on this country. Our CIA has enough problems without their notorious aversion to being led by an outsider being stirred up again. I want them focusing on the Islamists trying to kill us, not infighting at the agency.
When Panetta has weighed in on intelligence matters, he falls in line with the typical liberal position on interrogation methods, and is against anything that even remotely resembles torture. He said the following in this article he wrote:
We cannot simply suspend [American ideals of human rights] in the name of national security. Those who support torture may believe that we can abuse captives in certain select circumstances and still be true to our values. But that is a false compromise. We either believe in the dignity of the individual, the rule of law, and the prohibition of cruel and unusual punishment, or we don’t. There is no middle ground.
We cannot and we must not use torture under any circumstances. We are better than that.
If Panetta had been in charge the last eight years, I doubt we would have gotten the information we did from captured terrorists that saved countless lives in thwarted attacks.
It isn’t just Republicans who have problems with his inexperience, though. Even Diane Feinstein has expressed concerns.
Former California congressman and Clinton aide has little experience with spy agencies. Sen. Dianne Feinstein, incoming chair of the Senate Intelligence Committee, indicates she might oppose the pick.
I guess we can hope that his experience in several other government agencies, positions, and boards will be sufficient to guide him in protecting us. As the current administration is fond of saying, we only have to be wrong once.
UPDATE:
We’re doomed.
In filling four senior Justice Department positions Monday, President-elect Barack Obama signaled that he intends to roll back Bush administration counterterrorism policies authorizing harsh interrogation techniques, warrantless spying and indefinite detentions of terrorism suspects.
The most startling shift was Obama’s pick of Indiana University law professor Dawn Johnsen to take charge of the Office of Legal Counsel, the unit that’s churned out the legal opinions that provided a foundation for expanding President George W. Bush’s national security powers.
Johnsen, who spent five years in the Office of Legal Counsel during the Clinton administration and served as its acting chief, has publicly assailed “Bush’s corruption of our American ideals.” Upon the release last spring of a secret Office of Legal Counsel memo that backed tactics approaching torture for interrogations of terrorism suspects, she excoriated the unit’s lawyers for encouraging “horrific acts” and for advising Bush “that in fighting the war on terror, he is not bound by the laws Congress has enacted.”